Legal Opinion

Continental Purchasing Co. v. Van Raalte Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 19, 1937PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdgcomb, J.

This action is brought by the plaintiff, as assignee of Ethel L. Potter, to recover from the Van Raalte Co., Inc., the *152.employer of Mrs. Potter, the sum of nineteen dollars and twenty cents, wages earned by her while employed by the company. The defendant claims exoneration from liability by reason of having paid the amount involved direct to the assignor.

It is conceded that on April 21, 1934, Mrs. Potter assigned to the plaintiff all wages, or claims for wages, salary or commission earned, or to be earned, and all claims or demands due her from any person, firm or corporation by whom she was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lauer v. . DunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Briggs v. DorrNew York Supreme Court · 1821
  3. Anderson v. Van AlenNew York Supreme Court · 1815
  4. Wilkins v. BattermanNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  5. Johnson v. BloodgoodNew York Supreme Court · 1799

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. MTR. CHASE MANHATTAN v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Bond v. DentzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  4. TPZ Corp. v. DabbsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Poughkeepsie Savings Bank v. R & G Sloane Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API