Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 16, 1992PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

CLIFFORD, J.

When called on to apply a long-established rule of law, courts sometimes become afflicted with a certain inertia. The resultant ennui can blind courts to the desirability of reassessing the rule’s value and underlying rationale. This appeal is centered on just such a long-established and essentially unchallenged rule. The vast majority of jurisdictions, including New Jersey, *194have faithfully held that the question of materiality in a prosecution for perjury is one to be decided by the judge rather than the jury. See Annotation, Materiality…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Cage v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael E. GaudinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. People v. KobrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Brennan v. OrbanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  4. State v. DenofaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  5. State v. PurnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API