State v. Anderson
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
CLIFFORD, J.
When called on to apply a long-established rule of law, courts sometimes become afflicted with a certain inertia. The resultant ennui can blind courts to the desirability of reassessing the rule’s value and underlying rationale. This appeal is centered on just such a long-established and essentially unchallenged rule. The vast majority of jurisdictions, including New Jersey, *194have faithfully held that the question of materiality in a prosecution for perjury is one to be decided by the judge rather than the jury. See Annotation, Materiality…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Cage v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- United States v. Michael E. GaudinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- People v. KobrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Brennan v. OrbanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- State v. DenofaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- State v. PurnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.