New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Goldstein
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.
On August 11, 1964, the defendant insured a 1964 convertible coupe with the plaintiff. The policy, known as an automobile liability and physical damage policy, embraced loss by theft. One of the provisions was, “Except with respect to bailment lease, conditional sale *493purchase agreement, mortgage or other encumbrance, the named insured is the sole owner of the automobile, unless otherwise stated herein.” On October 28, 1964, the defendant reported to the plaintiff that the motor vehicle was stolen on October 22, 1964. On December 10, 1964, the plaintiff paid the defendant $5,075 upon receipt…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Charles, Henry & Crowley Co. Inc. v. Home Ins. Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Faris v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
3Cited by6 opinions
- Standard Electric Supply Co. v. Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
- Hackett v. Utica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1975
- Hackett v. Utica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1975
- Hackett v. Utica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Hackett v. Utica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.