Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hackett v. Utica Mutual Insurance

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided October 31, 1975No. 333246Published

1Dissent

DeGuglielmo, J. dissenting:

This is an action of contract on an insurance policy purporting to cover the plaintiff for loss of a motor vehicle which was stolen from her and which loss was alleged to have been insured by the defendant.

*204The case comes before the Appellate Division of this court on an agreed statement of facts set forth in the majority opinion.

The law is well settled in this Commonwealth that when a case has been submitted on an Agreed Statement of Facts, the result obtained thereby becomes a "case stated.” Requests for rulings and findings of fact by the trial court have no…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Associates Discount Corp. v. GillineauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  2. Hoyt v. New Hampshire Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942
  3. Richard D. Kimball Co. v. City of MedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  4. Dolan v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  5. Wainer v. Milford Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API