Legal Opinion

Chenault v. Houston Coca Cola Bottling Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1928No. 26302PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPack, J.

Appellant sued appellee in the circuit court of Pontotoc county. The declaration alleges that appellee was engaged in manufacturing and bottling for human consumption as a beverage, a drink known as Coca Cola; that said Coca Cola is manufactured-, bottled, and sold by appellee, under an implied warranty that it contains no foreign substance or matter that would be harmful or injurious to persons when drank as a beverage; and that appellant purchased from a local dealer a bottle of said drink so manufactured and sold by appellant, drank a portion thereof, when it was discovered that it…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Watson v. Augusta Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Jackson Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. ChapmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Coca-Cola Bottling Works v. LyonsMississippi Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Grapico Bottling Co. v. EnnisMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Rainwater v. Hattiesburg Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jacob E. Decker & Sons, Inc. v. CappsTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. EI DuPONT DE NEM. & CO. v. LadnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  3. E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. LadnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Laurel Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. HankinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  5. LAUREL COCA-COLA BOT. CO. v. HankinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API