Legal Opinion

Laurel Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Hankins

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1954No. 39361PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.

Mrs. Gladys Hankins obtained a judgment in the Circuit Court of Smith County against Laurel Coca Cola Bottling Company, a corporation, in the sum of $12,000, and the Bottling Company appealed.

The suit was a claim for damages, alleged to have been sustained by her as the result of drinking a portion *303of the contents of a coca cola. The gravamen of the complaint, for all practical purposes, is found in the following paragraph of the declaration to wit: “That this coca cola partially drank by plaintiff on April 3, 1952, in Smith County, Mississippi, contained a foreign substance known as ‘Acid…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jackson Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. ChapmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Coca-Cola Bottling Works v. LyonsMississippi Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Grapico Bottling Co. v. EnnisMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Rainwater v. Hattiesburg Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Blount v. Houston Coca Cola Bottling Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Riley v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Johnson v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Stevens v. Picayune Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Coast Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. BryantMississippi Supreme Court · 1959
  5. COAST COCA-COLA BTTL. CO. v. BryantMississippi Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API