Legal Opinion
In Re Biazo
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas
Decided July 20, 2004No. 19-40156PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DETERMINING THAT ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS SOUGHT BY SOUTH & ASSOCIATES IN CONNECTION WITH STAY RELIEF MOTIONS FILED ON BEHALF OF VARIOUS CREDITORS MUST BE DENIED
DALE L. SOMERS, Bankruptcy Judge.
These Chapter 7 matters are before the Court as a result of show cause orders issued on the Court’s own motion in each case. The law firm of South & Associates, P.C. (“South”), represents a number of home mortgage lenders or their loan servicing agents, and the firm filed a motion for stay relief on behalf of one of its clients in each of these cases. In fourteen of the cases, the debtors did not…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Owen v. OwenSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Atwood v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Co. (In Re Atwood)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Salomon North America v. Knupfer (In Re Wind N' Wave)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- In Re Empire Equities Capital Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- In re Old Colony, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- First National Bank v. Woods (In re Woods)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Charles Frederick Alvah Anderson and Theresa Cabrini AndersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.