Legal Opinion
Wigand v. Flo-Tek, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 19, 1979No. 36, Docket 79-7150PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUMBARD, Circuit Judge:
Defendants Harold Kiernan and Flo-Tek, Inc. appeal from a judgment entered against them on January 30, 1979 in the sum of $213,814.44 awarded to plaintiff Arthur Wigand after a nonjury trial before Judge Owen in the Southern District of New York on one count alleging common law fraud and deceit as well as misstatements in the sale of securities, and one count of breach of contract. We affirm the judgment as to liability of the defendants insofar as it is based on the Securities Act of 1933,15 U.S.C. 77a et seq., but we vacate and remand as to damages because of error in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Smith v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Demarco v. EdensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,030 Henry T. Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Randall v. LoftsgaardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- In Re Nationsmart Corporation Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Savino v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Federal Housing Finance Agency v. Nomura Holding America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Adair v. Hunt International Resources Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.