Legal Opinion

Mutton Hill Estates, Inc. v. Town of Oakland

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 15, 1983PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLASSMAN, Justice.

The Town of Oakland, the Oakland Planning Board, and the Oakland Board of Appeals appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Kennebec County, vacating and reversing the Planning Board and Board of Appeals’ denials of an application for subdivision approval submitted by Mutton Hill Estates, Inc., and remanding for the approval of such application. We affirm the Superior Court’s finding that the appellants violated Mutton Hill’s right to due process by unlawful preparation of the findings of facts supporting denial of Mutton Hill’s application. However, because of this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Danforth v. State Department of Health and WelfareSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  2. Frank v. Assessors of SkowheganSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  3. Cope v. Inhabitants of Town of BrunswickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  4. Bruk v. Town of GeorgetownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  5. Bennett v. DavisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Patrons Oxford Insurance v. HarrisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  2. Hall v. Board of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  3. Michaud v. Mutual Fire, Marine & Inland Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  4. H.E. Sargent, Inc. v. Town of WellsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  5. In Re Kristy Y.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API