Cridlebaugh v. Rudolph
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff sued to restrain the defendant’s alleged infringement of certain patents and, further, to redress other injury said to have been inflicted by the defendant. To the extent that the case is one arising under the patent laws of the United States, the District Court’s jurisdiction is invoked upon that basis.
The additional causes of action averred by the complaint are for the defendant’s alleged infringement of a common law trade-mark of the plaintiff and for the defendant’s alleged unfair competition. Jurisdiction of each of these causes is expressly predicated…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Delong Corporation v. Raymond International, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Gamlen Chemical Co. v. GamlenDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- Cummings v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- American Photographic Pub. Co. v. Ziff-Davis Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. SklarDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.