Legal Opinion
Cummings v. Moore
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 20, 1953No. 4476PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Circuit Judge.
This was an action instituted in the United States Court for Northern Oklahoma by W. D. Moore against William G. Cummings for a declaratory judgment determining and adjudicating that plaintiff was not infringing Letters Patent No. 2,496,381, issued to defendant, and relating to a brush for the application of tool joint dressing in oil field drilling operations. It was alleged in the complaint that both parties to the action were citizens of Oklahoma, and that the cause of action was one arising under the laws of the United States, namely 28 U.S.C. §§ 1338, 2201. It was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Becher v. Contoure Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Kennedy v. HazeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Aralac, Inc. v. Hat Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Kathleen K. Wilkin v. Sunbeam CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Consolidated Electrodynamics Corporation, a Corporation v. Midwestern Instruments, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Harold B. Wackerle and Evelyn Wackerle v. Pacific Employers Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
- Ausherman v. StumpCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.