Legal Opinion

State v. Horton

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 21, 2001No. 99-1286PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Justice.

Nannette Horton appealed her conviction for possession of marijuana, Iowa Code section 124.401(5) (1997), claiming her trial counsel was ineffective for failing to raise a timely motion to suppress evidence. The court of appeals affirmed, concluding that because there was no merit in her claim of an illegal search, a timely motion to suppress would not have been successful. On further review, we agree with that conclusion and therefore affirm the decision of the court of appeals and the judgment of the district court.

I. Facts and Prior Proceedings.

Horton was a passenger in a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Randall Lee PalsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  2. State Of Iowa Vs. James Maximiliano OchoaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  3. State v. WilkesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  4. State v. LeggSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  5. United States v. Ryan HaynesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API