Parker v. Parker
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GRAHAM, Judge.
Defendant questions only whether the court had jurisdiction to entertain plaintiff’s motion and not whether, if jurisdiction were present, the court could properly order him to post a bond. In passing we note that the court found that defendant no longer resides within this State and that he has no attorney of record in this case. Under these circumstances, requiring a bond was an appropriate method of enforcing the court’s decree. See G.S. 50-16.7(b) ; G.S. 50-13.4(f) (1).
The court had jurisdiction to hear the motion unless, as defendant contends, the consent judgment of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bunn v. BunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
3Cited by6 opinions
- White v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Seaborn v. SeabornCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Pachas by Pachas v. N.C. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- Bowers v. McFaddenDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
- Pachas v. N.C. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.