Legal Opinion

County of Merrick v. Beck

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1980No. 42684PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCown, J.

This is a statutory action under section 77-1509, R. R. S. 1943, for a $500 forfeiture for failure to respond to a subpoena duces tecum issued by the Merrick County Board of Equalization. The county court of Merrick County found the defendant had failed to comply with process and ordered the forfeiture of the statutory sum of $500. On appeal, the District Court for Merrick County, Nebraska, found that the defendant was not technically in violation of section 77-1509, R. R. S. 1943, reversed the judgment of the county court, and dismissed the action. The county has appealed.

On May 13, 1977,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Interests of WorrellNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Fauss Construction, Inc. v. City of HooperNebraska Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Riggs National Bank of Washington, D.C. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. State v. Two IGT Video Poker GamesNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Denton v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. ZimmerNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State v. ZimmerNebraska Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API