Legal Opinion
State v. Wilson
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided September 21, 2005No. 25,017PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CASTILLO, Judge.
{1} In the metropolitan court, Defendant Robert Wilson was convicted of criminal trespass and harassment; neither crime is listed in the Crimes Against Household Members Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 30-3-10 to -16 (1995, as amended through 2001). Accordingly, convictions for criminal trespass and harassment do not require proof that the victim was a household member. But the status of the victim as a household member becomes relevant when Defendant appeals. If the victim of these two crimes is a household member, the incident is considered domestic abuse under the Family Violence…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gunaji v. MacIasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. Sergio B.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. TrujilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Schwartz v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. KrauseNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. FavelaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
- Alcantar v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Kimbrell v. KimbrellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. FavelaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.