Legal Opinion
Yousafzai v. Hyundai Motor America
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 17, 1994No. B072195PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
from superior court to municipal court after determining the amount at stake was insufficient for superior court jurisdiction. Plaintiff appealed. We hold this order is reviewable solely through a writ proceeding and thus dismiss the appeal.
Facts and Proceedings Below
Appellant and plaintiff, Niaz A. Yousafzai, purchased a new 1989 Hyundai Excel GLS automobile in April of 1989. The automobile was distributed by defendant and respondent Hyundai Motor America and the purchase was accompanied by various warranties. After the purchase, the appellant returned the automobile to the respondent…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Keenan v. DeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Muller v. ReaghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Davis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Campbell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pegastaff v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Garau v. Torrance Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Ash v. Hertz Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Eckhart v. Genuine Parts DistributorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- PegaStaff v. Cal. PUCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015