Legal Opinion

Amphastar Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Aventis Pharma SA

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 11, 2017No. 14-56382, 15-56209; 15-56122PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

We must decide whether we have subject matter jurisdiction over a corporate qui tarn action 1 under the False Claims Act that accuses a competing company of committing fraud against the United States.

I

This saga began in the early 1990s, when Aventis Pharma S.A., (“Aventis”) a French pharmaceutical enterprise, 2 developed a plan to sell the drug enoxaparin in the United States under the brand name Lovenox. Enoxaparin is a heparin-based blood thinner that was patented in Europe in the 1980s as European Patent 40,144 (“EP144”). Eventually, European authorities…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. United States Ex Rel. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. United States of America, Ex Rel. Springfield Terminal Railway Company David A. Fink v. Francis X. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. John Benavidez v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  2. Raniere v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  3. Citizens for Free Speech, LLC v. County of AlamedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. Zachary Silbersher v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals Int'lCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  5. COMANCHE NATION OF OKLAHOMA v. COFFEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API