Amphastar Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Aventis Pharma SA
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether we have subject matter jurisdiction over a corporate qui tarn action 1 under the False Claims Act that accuses a competing company of committing fraud against the United States.
I
This saga began in the early 1990s, when Aventis Pharma S.A., (“Aventis”) a French pharmaceutical enterprise, 2 developed a plan to sell the drug enoxaparin in the United States under the brand name Lovenox. Enoxaparin is a heparin-based blood thinner that was patented in Europe in the 1980s as European Patent 40,144 (“EP144”). Eventually, European authorities…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. United States Ex Rel. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Springfield Terminal Railway Company David A. Fink v. Francis X. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- John Benavidez v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Raniere v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Citizens for Free Speech, LLC v. County of AlamedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Zachary Silbersher v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals Int'lCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- COMANCHE NATION OF OKLAHOMA v. COFFEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.