Legal Opinion

Buelow v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 26, 1925No. 24,744PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action to recover for injuries sustained by the plaintiff and damages done to his auto in a collision at a crossing in Owatonna. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals from the judgment.

The defendant concedes that the evidence made an issue for the jury on its negligence. The only question is whether there was contributory negligence of the plaintiff preventing a recovery.

1. At the Bridge street crossing, where the accident occurred, the defendant provided a flagman. He was not there on the morning of the accident. The plaintiff knew that a flagman was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Woehrle v. Minnesota Transfer Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  2. Stegner v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. Haugen v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. Wardner v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  5. Lang v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anton v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Munson v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Muggenburg v. LeightonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API