Legal Opinion
Application of States Marine Corp. of Delaware
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 7, 1954PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NOONAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on two motions; one to confirm, and the other to vacate, an award of arbitrators pursuant to the U. S. Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 9 and 10, respectively. The award was rendered in connection with a dispute under a time charter party dated January 5, 1951.
That there should be great hesitation in upsetting an arbitration award is clear. Karppinen v. Karl Kiefer Machine Co., 2 Cir., 187 F.2d 32. But if the arbitrators determined matters not within the terms of the arbitration agreement, or failed to determine matters within the terms of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- American Almond Products Co. v. Consolidated Pecan Sales Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Karppinen v. Karl Kiefer MacHine Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Oil Workers International Union, Local No. 463 v. Texoma Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- Texoma Natural Gas Co. v. Oil Workers International Union, Local No. 463District Court, N.D. Texas · 1943
3Cited by19 opinions
- New England Power Company v. Asiatic Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- Birmingham News Co. v. HornSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Maxus, Inc. v. SciaccaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Hereford v. D.R. Horton, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
- RP Industries, Inc. v. S & M EQUIP. CO.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.