Legal Opinion

Holt v. Utica Mutual Insurance

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1988No. CV-87-0273-PRPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.

This petition for review asks us to determine whether there are genuine issues of material fact precluding summary judgment on insurance questions of duty to defend, breach of a cooperation clause and substantial prejudice to an insurer. We granted review to clarify several matters of statewide importance. Rule 23, Ariz.R. Civ.App.P., 17A A.R.S. We have jurisdiction under Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3) and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

The operative facts are undisputed. William G. Holt paid insurance agent Vince Anderson for liability insurance on…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Damron v. SledgeArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. HelmeArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Sandoval v. ChenowethArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Nicoletti v. Westcor, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Tribe v. Shell Oil Co., Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. PAJ, Inc. v. Hanover Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Snug Harbor, Ltd. v. Zurich InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PeatonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  4. Clark Equipment Co. v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty FundCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  5. Jacob Benson v. Casa De Capri EnterprisesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API