Legal Opinion
Delaney v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 12, 2014No. 3:13-cv-01761-STPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1218OPINION AND ORDER
MOSMAN, District Judge.
On November 17, 2014, Magistrate Judge Stewart issued her Findings and Recommendations (“F & R”) [39], recommending that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [25] be DENIED and Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment on the Pleading [26] should be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. No objections to the F & R were filed.
DISCUSSION
The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, but retains responsibility for making the final…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Jasim Ghanim v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brown v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of Am.District Court, C.D. California · 2019
- Murphy v. California Physicians ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Boykin v. UNUM Life Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Mulhern v. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021