Legal Opinion

Linda Leffman, Plaintif-Appellant v. Sprint Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 30, 2007No. 06-3211PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.

In this employment discrimination suit, Plaintiff-Appellant Linda Leffman (“Leff-man”) alleges that Defendant-Appellee Sprint Corporation (“Sprint”) violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., by denying her, in calculating her years of service at the time of her termination in 2000, credit for time that she spent on maternity leave in 1976. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Sprint, and Leffman now appeals. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Bazemore v. FridaySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Dixon v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  5. Shelby County Health Care Corporation v. Southern Council of Industrial Workers Health and Welfare Trust Fund,defendant-Appellant, Tracy MasonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. AT&T Corp. v. HulteenSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Hulteen v. AT & T CORP.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Automotive Body Parts Ass'n v. Ford Global Technologies, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
  4. AT&T Corp. v. HulteenSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Gaines v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API