Hannewald v. Fairfield Communities, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1ConcurrenceFranks, Justice
I concur with the results reached by the majority but I do not accept the conclusion that T.C.A., § 48-718 authorizes the award of attorneys’ fees in this case. The statute specifically applies to “suits brought on behalf of the corporation for profit.” In my view, the application of this statute to a not-for-profit corporation is an unwarranted extension of the statute.
The majority relies on Bourne v. Williams, 633 S.W.2d 469 (1981), which held T.C.A., § 48-718 authorizes shareholder derivative suits by members of a not-for-profit corporation. The Bourne case unnecessarily distorts the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State Ex Rel. Orr v. ThomasTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
- Grant v. Lookout Mountain Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1894
- Range v. Tennessee Burley Tobacco Growers Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1955
- Knapp v. Supreme Commandery, United Order of the Golden Cross of the WorldTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.