Grant v. Lookout Mountain Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM HAMILTON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Hamilton County. T- M. McConnell, Ch.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAlisteR, J.
The single question presented for determination in this cause is whether complainants below are entitled to have counsel fees allowed and declared a lien on the property recovered. The proceedings in which the professional services were rendered were commenced by’ M. G-rant and others, minority stockholders in the Lookout Mountain Company, against said corporation and certain officers and directors therein, to enjoin a sale of all the real and personal property of the corporation to a Boston syndicate, to be paid for in bonds covering the property of defendant corporation and two other…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. PettusSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Meddaugh v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
3Cited by38 opinions
- Ramey v. Cincinnati Enquirer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Hempstead v. Meadville Theological SchoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Southern v. Beeler, Atty.-Gen.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1946
- House v. Estate of EdmondsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- Forrester v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.