Margules v. Crim
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
DENTON, Chief Justice.
This is a suit by appellants, plaintiffs below, to recover upon a sworn account for produce alleged to have been sold and delivered to appellees, defendants below. It is undisputed that the amount of produce delivered to the C. B. Crim Produce Company was $2,087.58 and that the account has not been paid. The case was tried to a jury.
The evidence showed Mr. Crim had been in the produce business in Dallas some 20 years and operated under the firm name of Crim Produce Company. Brad V. Dowdy was a stepson of Crim and had worked for the Crim Produce Company from time to time.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Prætorians v. StricklandTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Holland v. BlanchardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Newton v. Town of Highland ParkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Thompson v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hardeman v. Parish, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1987
- Southwestern Investment Co. v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- State v. StandardTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. StandardTexas Supreme Court · 1967