State v. Standard
Texas Supreme Court
1DissentGriffin, Justice
I cannot agree to the majority opinion herein. In my judgment it gives an entirely new meaning to the Relinquishment Act contrary to all previously decided cases. It puts in question the true purpose of the Act and leaves the law in a state of uncertainty and confusion as it existed prior to the decision by the Court of Greene v. Robison, 117 Tex. 516, 8 S.W.2d 655 (1928); Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. State, 121 Tex. *154138, 47 S.W.2d 265 (1938), and every later case construing the Relinquishment Act.
In order to put this case in its proper perspective, I would call attention to the fact that it…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Clark v. BarnardSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Cleveland v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Coleman v. ZappTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- Gunter v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Swilley v. McCainTexas Supreme Court · 1964
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.