Legal Opinion
Hunt v. Check Recovery Systems, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 21, 2007No. C05-04993 MJJ, C05-02037 MJJPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JENKINS, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Before the Court are Defendant Imperial Merchant Services d.b.a. Check Recovery Systems’ (“Defendant” or “Imperial”) and Plaintiffs Brandy Hunt (“Hunt”) and Brian Castillo’s (“Castillo”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) cross motions for summary judgment. 1 The parties oppose each other’s motions. For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and GRANTS, in part, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment.
FACTUAL…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Imperial Merchant Services, Inc. v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Hunt v. Imperial Merchant Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Dey v. Continental Central CreditCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Mussetter Distributing, Inc. v. Dbi Beverage Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Imperial Merchant Services, Inc. v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.