Legal Opinion

Ragland v. Sheehan

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1993No. 92-392PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber

This is an appeal from a judgment by the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, granting plaintiff Dick Ragland judgment for breach of contract in the amount of $35,000 plus costs and interest. We affirm.

We consider the following issues on appeal:

1. Did the District Court err in finding a contract existed between Dick Ragland and William Sheehan, Jr., in which Sheehan promised to pay $35,000 for the chance to consider participation in Ragland’s hydroelectric project?

2. Did the District Court err in admitting testimony by Ragland and Doak concerning the Montana Power Company…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Interstate Production Credit Ass'n v. DesayeMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Randolph v. Peterson, Inc. v. J.R. Simplot Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Quayle v. MacKertIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Phillip R. Morrow, Inc. v. FBS Insurance MontanaMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Trad Industries, Ltd. v. BroganMontana Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. Roman Catholic ChurchMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. In Re the Marriage of RockMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. DEPT. OF SECURITIES EX REL. FAUGHT v. BlairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  4. Estate of Pruyn v. Axmen Propane, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Welu v. Twin Hearts Smiling Horses, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API