Legal Opinion

Estate of Pruyn v. Axmen Propane, Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 2009No. DA 08-0352PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 Earl Pruyn filed suit against Edward Kimbrell and Axmen Propane, Inc. (Axmen) claiming they had defaulted under the terms of a promissory note. After Pruyn’s death in June 2008, his estate was substituted as plaintiff in this case. Eventually, the District Court for the Fourth Judicial District, Missoula County, denied Pruyn’s motions for summary judgment and granted Axmen’s cross-motions for summary judgment and awarded Axmen its attorney’s fees. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion.

¶2 Pruyn raises the following issues on…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Stanley L. and Carolyn M. Watkins Trust v. LacostaMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Foy v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Montana Petroleum Tank Release Compensation Board v. Crumleys, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Trustees of Indiana University v. BuxbaumMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Essex Insurance v. Moose's Saloon, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. Roman Catholic ChurchMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Associated Mgmt. Servs., Inc. v. RuffMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Hinebaugh v. McRaeMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Total Industrial Plant Services, Inc. v. Turner Industries Group, LLC.Montana Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Welu v. Twin Hearts Smiling Horses, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2016

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API