Legal Opinion

Worrell v. Roxana Petroleum Corp.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 24, 1930No. 19436PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, C.

This is an action by the Roxana Petroleum Corporation against C. C. Worrell, to recover one-half of the proceeds of a certain judgment which Worrell had obtained and in which the Roxana Petroleum Corporation was primarily interested. The suit was on a contract between it and Wor-rell, whereby Worrell, for a good and valuable consideration, agreed to apportion one-lialf of the proceeds of the judgment to the plaintiff.

The history of the controversy is somewhat novel. In fact, it is as much befitting a plot for a thrilling book on human intrigue and fraud-complex as it is a proper…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sedgwick v. . StantonNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  2. Thallhimer v. BrinckerhoffNew York Supreme Court · 1824
  3. Smith v. . HartsellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. Gilman, Son & Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  5. Richardson v. RowlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1873

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Will of PendergrassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Mitchell v. Amerada Hess Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. Brown v. DurhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Rienhardt v. KellyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Temeron, Inc. v. Ferraro Energy Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API