Legal Opinion
Mandl v. Mandl
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 2, 1946PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtNull, J.
The defendant appears specially on this motion to set aside the service by publication of the summons and complaint in this action.
The suit was brought to recover past due installments of alimony which the defendant agreed to pay to the plaintiff, his former wife, under a written contract executed in Vienna, Austria. The plaintiff resides in France,- the defendant, in Argentina.
There is, first, the challenge to the jurisdiction of the court, predicated upon the fact that the action is between nonresidents upon a contract executed in a foreign country.
These circumstances, however, do not…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- American Surety Co. v. ConnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Skilton v. . CodingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Gregonis v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Wedemann v. United States Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Citibank, N.A. v. Bombshell Taxi LLC (In re Hypnotic Taxi LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2016