Legal Opinion
Böwe Passat Reinigungs-Und Wäschereitechnik GmbH v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 8, 1996No. Slip Op. 96-73. Court No. 92-01-00058PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Judge:
Plaintiff Bowe-Passat (“Bowe”), a German manufacturer of dry cleaning machinery, moves for judgment on the administrative record. See USCIT R. 56.2. Bowe asks the Court (1) to vacate both the final results of a United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) administrative review 1 and a corresponding remand decision dated August 5, 1993, and (2) to remand this case to the agency for further action. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(c) and section 516A(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(a)(2) (1988).
Background
Commerce’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Timken Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Dorbest Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- United States Steel Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Corus Staal BV v. United States Department of CommerceUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.