Legal Opinion

United States v. Smith

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided January 26, 1989No. ACMR 8701307PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

DeFORD, Senior Judge:

Pursuant to his pleas, the appellant was convicted of violating a lawful general regulation, United States Forces Korea Regulation 60-1, 25 February 1985 [hereinafter USFK Reg. 60-1], by wrongfully purchasing goods for illegal transfer, violating a lawful general regulation, USFK Reg. 60-1, by purchasing goods in excess of ration limitations, violating a lawful general regulation, United States Forces Korea Regulation 27-5, 20 May 1986 [hereinafter USFK Reg. 27-5], by wrongfully transferring goods to persons not authorized tax-free privileges,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  4. United States v. GravesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  5. United States v. HoltUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. HerdU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
  2. United States v. FlanniganU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  3. United States v. JuarezU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API