Legal Opinion
City of Strafford v. Croxdale
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided November 12, 2008No. SD 28746PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DON E. BURRELL, Presiding Judge.
Max G. Croxdale (“Croxdale”) appeals from a judgment finding him guilty of violating an ordinance of the City of Straf-ford (“the City”) that requires its residents to connect to the City’s sanitary sewer system. Croxdale asserts two points of error: 1) the trial court erroneously interpreted the law when it concluded that a “proper sanitary sewer” under the applicable city ordinance meant only the City’s publicly owned treatment works (“POTW”); and 2) the term “proper sanitary sewer” also includes a “private waste 1 treatment facility” and the City did not…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Coca-Cola Co. v. NixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- Finnegan v. Old Republic Title Co. of St. Louis, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- Kansas City v. HendersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
- Kansas City v. WilhoitMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Bellefontaine Neighbors v. ScatizziMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- City of Joplin v. MarstonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Sunswept Properties, LLC v. Northeast Public Sewer DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- CITY OF DEXTER v. McClainMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- City of Joplin v. KleinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.