Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Coca-Cola Co. v. Nixon

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 2008No. SC 88531PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM RAY PRICE, JR., Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Diana Pennington alleges that Coca-Cola made affirmative misrepresentations and omitted material information regarding the types of artificial sweeteners used in fountain Diet Coke in violation of section 407.025. 1 At Pennington’s request, the circuit court certified the lawsuit as a class action. In its petition for a writ of prohibition, Coca-Cola argues that the circuit court abused its discretion when it certified an overly broad and indefinite class. This Court issued a preliminary writ, which we now make absolute.

II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Carol B. Oshana v. Coca-Cola Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  3. Albert Kornberg and Laura Kornberg v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Davoll v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. DeBremaecker v. ShortCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Buemi v. KerckhoffSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  2. State Ex Rel. Henley v. BickelSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  3. First National Bank of Dieterich v. Pointe Royale Property Owners' Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  4. Hope v. Nissan North America, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Mitchell v. Residential Funding Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API