State Ex Rel. Coca-Cola Co. v. Nixon
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM RAY PRICE, JR., Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Diana Pennington alleges that Coca-Cola made affirmative misrepresentations and omitted material information regarding the types of artificial sweeteners used in fountain Diet Coke in violation of section 407.025. 1 At Pennington’s request, the circuit court certified the lawsuit as a class action. In its petition for a writ of prohibition, Coca-Cola argues that the circuit court abused its discretion when it certified an overly broad and indefinite class. This Court issued a preliminary writ, which we now make absolute.
II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Carol B. Oshana v. Coca-Cola Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Albert Kornberg and Laura Kornberg v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Davoll v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- DeBremaecker v. ShortCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Buemi v. KerckhoffSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
- State Ex Rel. Henley v. BickelSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- First National Bank of Dieterich v. Pointe Royale Property Owners' Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
- Hope v. Nissan North America, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Mitchell v. Residential Funding Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.