National Electric Signaling Co. v. Telefunken Wireless Telegeaph Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
In. Equity. Suit by the National Electric Signaling (Company and others against the Telefunken Wireless Telegraph Company of the United States for infringement of letters patent No. 706,736 for apparatus for wireless telegraphy granted to R. A. Fessenden, August 12, 1902. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
HAND, District Judge.
I group the 14 claims here in suit into three classes: First, the claims for the direct transformation of the current into motion, 1, 4, 22, 23, and 34; second, the claims for “tuning,” 6, 10, 13, 28, 29, 30, 33 and 35; and, third, claim 15, the “low-resistance” claim, with which also belong claims 22 and 23. Some of the “tuning” claims are also claims for direct transformation, but they need no separate consideration from the direct transformation claims themselves.
[1] First, I will consider the “transformation” claims, some of which I quite agree, as mere matter of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United Wireless Telegraph Co. v. National Electric Signaling Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1912
3Cited by8 opinions
- Marconi Wireless Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. of America v. National Electric Signaling Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1914
- Kintner v. Atlantic Communication Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Kintner v. Atlantic Communication Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917
- Fessenden v. Radio Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.