Schantz v. Maass
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Petitioner has petitioned for review of our decision that affirmed the trial court’s denial of relief that he requested under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act. 110 Or App 373, 822 P2d 762 (1991). ORS 138.510 - ORS 138.680. We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15(1), and allow it.
Petitioner was convicted on two counts of robbery in the first degree, ORS 164.415, in a stipulated facts trial. He was sentenced to consecutive terms on each count and was ordered to pay restitution. He did not appeal; instead, he sought post-conviction relief. In his petition, he alleges that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Hunter v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
3Cited by3 opinions
- Goodwin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. BeckhamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Goodwin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993