Legal Opinion

Schantz v. Maass

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 8, 1992No. 90C-10800; CA A67488PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Petitioner has petitioned for review of our decision that affirmed the trial court’s denial of relief that he requested under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act. 110 Or App 373, 822 P2d 762 (1991). ORS 138.510 - ORS 138.680. We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15(1), and allow it.

Petitioner was convicted on two counts of robbery in the first degree, ORS 164.415, in a stipulated facts trial. He was sentenced to consecutive terms on each count and was ordered to pay restitution. He did not appeal; instead, he sought post-conviction relief. In his petition, he alleges that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Hunter v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. State v. BeckhamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Goodwin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API