INX International Ink Co. v. Delphi Energy & Engine Management Systems
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
WARREN, District Judge.
Now before the Court is defendant’s, City of Milwaukee, motion to dismiss the plaintiffs Fourth Claim for Relief (Nuisance), Fifth Claim for Relief (Negligence) and Sixth Claim for Relief (Property Damage). For the reasons that follow, the motion by the City of Milwaukee is GRANTED.
I. INTRODUCTION
The underlying cause of action between plaintiffs INX International Ink Company (“INX”) and Menard, Inc. and defendants A.C. Rochester, et al. alleges claims pursuant to Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), Resource…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Quebell P. Parker v. Scrap Metal Processors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Raytheon Co. v. McGraw-Edison Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1997
- Giardino v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Messinger v. MooreDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2021
- Stover v. The College of William and Mary in VirginiaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2022