Legal Opinion
Joseph v. Yenkin Majestic Paint Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 25, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
James H. Shaw, Jr., J.
In this action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant PACOA, an acronym for Paint Applicator Corporation of America, seeks summary judgment dismissing the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3212.
This lawsuit asserts claims of strict products liability, breach of express warranty, breach of implied warranty, and negligence against defendant PACOA and other defendants. The product alleged to be tortiously defective is Super Speed Seal— Prime Coat (Super Speed Seal), a liquid wood sealant that plaintiff alleges emits flammable vapors under…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harrigan v. Super Products Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Kirby v. Rouselle Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1981
- Blackburn v. Johnson Chemical Co.New York Supreme Court · 1985
- Giuffrida v. Panasonic Industrial Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by4 opinions
- Eberhart v. Amazon.com, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Joseph v. Yenkin Majestic Paint Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Grubb v. Do It Best CorporationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Bielicki v. T. J. Bentey, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998