Harrigan v. Super Products Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff sustained injuries while using a high-powered sewer cleaner manufactured by defendant Super Products Corporation (Super Products) and distributed by defendant Dow & Co., Inc. (Dow). The complaint alleged causes of action against both defendants for negligence and strict products liability, and Dow asserted a cross claim against Super Products for common-law indemnification.
Supreme Court properly denied Super Products’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff alleged, inter alia, that the sewer cleaner was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sukljian v. Charles Ross & Son Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Beyrle v. FinneronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Putnick v. H.M.C. AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Alessandrini v. Weyerhauser Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Giuffrida v. Panasonic Industrial Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Urena v. The Biro Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Nichols v. Agway, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Smith v. Royce W. Day Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Ganter v. Makita U.S.A., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.