Legal Opinion

Catalano v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1942No. Appeal, 248PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rhodes, J.,

Opinion by

Plaintiff brought this action in assumpsit against defendant to recover total and permanent disability benefits alleged to be due under an insurance policy. The relevant provision of the policy is printed in the margin.

In October, 1937, plaintiff underwent an operation. Disability benefits were paid to Mm at tbe rate of $100 per month 2 to and including June, 1938. In July, 1938, defendant notified plaintiff that it was restoring his policy to a premium paying basis, and refused to pay any further monthly benefits. Its position was that plaintiff was not totally and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Critzer Et Ux. v. DonovanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. De Reeder v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Cooper v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Henderson v. National Drug Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Pearlman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cobb v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Cobosco v. Life Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Moskowitz v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Cobosco v. Life Assurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API