Patton v. Worthington Associates, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice SAYLOR.
The issue presented concerns whether Appellant is a statutory employer per the Workers’ Compensation Act and, as such, enjoys immunity from civil liability for injuries sustained by Appellee Earl Patton.
*645Pursuant to Section 302(b) of the Workers’ Compensation Act,1 77 P.S. § 462, general contractors bear secondary liability for the payment of workers’' compensation benefits to injured workers employed by their subcontractors. See McDonald v. Levinson Steel Co., 302 Pa. 287, 294-95, 153 A. 424, 426 (1930). In this sense, general contractors have been denominated “statutory…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McDonald v. Levinson Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Lumax Industries, Inc. v. AultmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Fonner v. Shandon, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- William Rolick v. Collins Pine Company and Collins Pine Company, T/d/b/a Kane Hardwood DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Qualp v. James Stewart Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sheard v. J.J. DeLuca Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Yoder, J. v. McCarthy Const., IncSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- Feldman, B. v. Vito Braccia Constr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
- Acker v. Ray Angelini, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Maria Garlick v. Trans Tech Logistics IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.