Legal Opinion

Patton v. Worthington Associates, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 2014PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice SAYLOR.

The issue presented concerns whether Appellant is a statutory employer per the Workers’ Compensation Act and, as such, enjoys immunity from civil liability for injuries sustained by Appellee Earl Patton.

*645Pursuant to Section 302(b) of the Workers’ Compensation Act,1 77 P.S. § 462, general contractors bear secondary liability for the payment of workers’' compensation benefits to injured workers employed by their subcontractors. See McDonald v. Levinson Steel Co., 302 Pa. 287, 294-95, 153 A. 424, 426 (1930). In this sense, general contractors have been denominated “statutory…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Levinson Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Lumax Industries, Inc. v. AultmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Fonner v. Shandon, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. William Rolick v. Collins Pine Company and Collins Pine Company, T/d/b/a Kane Hardwood DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  5. Qualp v. James Stewart Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sheard v. J.J. DeLuca Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Yoder, J. v. McCarthy Const., IncSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  3. Feldman, B. v. Vito Braccia Constr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. Acker v. Ray Angelini, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Maria Garlick v. Trans Tech Logistics IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API