Legal Opinion

Maria Garlick v. Trans Tech Logistics Inc

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 18, 2015No. 14-4186, 14-4698UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION *

2Per curiam

Maria Gariick appeals the District Court’s order granting QC’s 1 motion for summary judgment on the ground that QC was George Garlick’s statutory employer and thus entitled to immunity under the Pennsylvania Worker’s Compensation Act (“PWCA”), 77 P.S. § 1 et seq., and its order granting Anadarko’s 2 motion for summary judgment on the ground that Anadarko was not negligent. For the reasons set forth below, we will affirm in part and vacate in part.

I

George Gariick drove a water truck for Trans Tech Logistics (“TTL”). 3 TTL leased its vehicles and provided drivers to QC, which operated…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Dee v. Borough of DunmoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. McDonald v. Levinson Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Scampone v. Highland Park Care Center, LLCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Simpson House, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Dobransky, E. v. EQT ProductionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  3. GARRIS v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API