Maria Garlick v. Trans Tech Logistics Inc
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION *
2Per curiam
Maria Gariick appeals the District Court’s order granting QC’s 1 motion for summary judgment on the ground that QC was George Garlick’s statutory employer and thus entitled to immunity under the Pennsylvania Worker’s Compensation Act (“PWCA”), 77 P.S. § 1 et seq., and its order granting Anadarko’s 2 motion for summary judgment on the ground that Anadarko was not negligent. For the reasons set forth below, we will affirm in part and vacate in part.
I
George Gariick drove a water truck for Trans Tech Logistics (“TTL”). 3 TTL leased its vehicles and provided drivers to QC, which operated…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dee v. Borough of DunmoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- McDonald v. Levinson Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Scampone v. Highland Park Care Center, LLCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Simmons v. Simpson House, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Dobransky, E. v. EQT ProductionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- GARRIS v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025