McDermott v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Action for false imprisonment in which plaintiff had a verdict for $3,500. Defendant made a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and, in the event that should be denied, made a motion for a new trial. The motion for judgment was denied, but the motion for a new trial was granted unless plaintiff should file a written consent that the verdict be reduced to $1,800. Plaintiff filed the written consent, and judgment was entered on the verdict as so reduced. Defendant appealed therefrom.
Defendant uses the depot of the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company for its…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smith v. MunchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Barrett v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Roemer v. Jacob Schmidt Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Durgin v. CohenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Lesch v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hallen v. Montgomery Ward Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938