Legal Opinion

Harris v. Temple

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 19, 1990No. 8912SC649PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

The trial of this action for slander ended in plaintiff obtaining judgment for $3,500 in compensatory damages and $7,500 in punitive damages for being falsely accused by the defendants of giving the Kroger store a worthless check for groceries. Since the action is for slander per se, the verdict and judgment can stand only if the evidence presented is sufficient to establish the following: (1) That defendant spoke base or defamatory words which tended to prejudice her in her reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood or hold her up to disgrace, ridicule or…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. West v. King's Department Store, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Badame v. LampkeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Southwest Drug Stores of Mississippi, Inc. v. GarnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Oates v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Little Stores v. IsenbergCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Donovan v. FiumaraCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  2. Food Lion, Inc. v. MeltonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1995
  3. Smith v. Carolina Coach Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API