Legal Opinion

Philadelphia Home for Incurables v. Philadelphia Saving Fund Society

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 5, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered, by

Parker, J.

The respondent Philadelphia Saving Eund Society in 1911 loaned to George K. Breintnall, now deceased, the sum of $250,000 on his bond secured by a mortgage covering a large business building in Philadelphia at the corner of Thirteenth and Arch streets, known as the “telephone building.” The mortgage was never paid or foreclosed: Breintnall died testate in 1927, having been for many years a resident of Atlantic City in this state. His will was proved in Atlantic county, and the Orphans Court of that county has continuously exercised…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Philadelphia Saving Fund Society v. DisstonPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1937

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. HarloffNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  2. Camden Trust Co. v. HaldemanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  3. Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  4. Lukens v. Camden Trust CompanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
  5. In Re McDougalNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API