Legal Opinion

Adriance v. Henry Duncan Corp.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 24, 1935PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtField, J.

These two actions of tort were tried together. The first is an action by the surviving husband of Lizzie W. Adriance, deceased, as administrator of her estate, to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained by her in the defendant's hardware store. The second is an action by the surviving husband in his own right to recover consequential damages. There was a verdict for the plaintiff in each case. The cases come before us on the defendant's exceptions, including exceptions to the denial of its motions for directed verdicts. The only questions argued *203by the defendant are its…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kelley v. GoldbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. Crone v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Hendricken v. MeadowsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Kennedy v. Cherry & Webb Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Ginns v. C. T. Sherer Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. LeBlanc v. Atlantic Building & Supply Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. Letiecq v. Denholm & McKay Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  3. Richardson v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. O'Hanley v. NorwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. Parker v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API