Legal Opinion

People v. Aarons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 24, 2003PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Buckley, P.J.

On a Friday afternoon, the grand jury lacked the votes necessary to take action. The foreperson so advised the prosecutor. Hearing this, the prosecutor requested the grand jury to cease deliberations and return the following week for additional testimony. This stoppage was a hiatus in procedure, not a termination of deliberations. This interim stoppage does not amount to a grand jury dismissal of the charges. The dismissal should be reversed and the indictment reinstated.

On March 3, 1999, 13-year-old Nasheem and his 15-year-old sister, Naiecha, testified…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. People v. HobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Albano v. KirbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. People v. WilkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. New York State Bankers Ass'n v. AlbrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. AaronsNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. People v. PryorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. People v. RiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Forman v. HenkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. IKB Intl., S.A. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API