Legal Opinion
L & H AIRCO, INC. v. Rapistan Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 6, 1989No. C2-88-1796, C4-88-1878Published
1Opinion of the Court
446 N.W.2d 372 (1989)
L & H AIRCO, INC. (formerly L & H Enterprises, Inc.), Respondent,
v.
RAPISTAN CORP., successor by merger to Lear Siegler, Inc., Mammoth Division, et al., Respondents (C2-88-1796), Defendants (C4-88-1878), Alan C. Eidsness, et al., Petitioners, Respondents (C2-88-1796), Appellants (C4-88-1878), Robert L. Michaud, Petitioner, Appellant (C2-88-1796), Respondent (C4-88-1878).
Nos. C2-88-1796, C4-88-1878.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
October 6, 1989.
Rehearing Denied November 29, 1989.
Hart, Bruner & O'Brien, P.A., B.C. Hart, and Gregory T. Spalj, Minneapolis, for appellant, Robert L.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Friedman v. DozorcMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Florenzano v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.