Green v. Prince Metallic Paint Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 52, Jan. T., 1904, by defendant, from decree of C. P. Carbon Co., Oct. T., 1902, No. 1, on bill in equity in case of Richard Green v. Prince Metallic Paint Company. Motion to quash appeal. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rice, Pi J.,
This cause being at issue upon bill, answer and replication, was duly tried in the mode prescribed by the equity rules. On July 2, 1903, the judge filed his findings of law and fact, together with an opinion, and directed that a decree be drawn in accordance therewith. The counsel for the plaintiff pre*416pared a decree, and on July 6 served a copy on the defendant’s counsel and gave him notice that it would be submitted to the court on July 13. On July 11/the latter filed exceptions to the judge’s findings of law and fact. On July 13, the court signed the decree that had…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Watkins v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Cassidy v. KnappSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Hinnershitz v. United Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Palethorp v. PalethorpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Chester Traction Co. v. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McMellen v. WilliamsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Haytock v. Nickel, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1933